Published Thursday, May 8, 2008 at 12:07
by
asa.westlund
in Save our planet (80 views and 2 comments)
Almost
daily we hear alarming news about one of the biggest challenges
of our time – the one about the global warming. As citizens and
consumers we have a responsibility to act. A responsibility not
always easy to handle. Scientific reports from governments,
companies and others are sometimes contradictory, and it’s easy
to lose hope and feel powerless. This is where the EU, as a big
actor on the world wide market has an important role to play. It
is here we see the necessity of political action rather than just
letting the free market decide.
But it is not enough- It must also be easier for all European
citizens to make environment friendly decisions and thereby
taking their own responsibility! The environmental crisis is to
enormous and complex to be solved on just one political level.
Its first when we act both individually, locally, in larger
regions and globally that we can make a change. It does not mean
that we can wait for someone else to take responsibility, rather
that we all must take action now. We have to act as a united
front. Many citizens are trying to take action. With everyday
actions, like leaving the car at home and travel by bus, or
buying locally produced and bio grown products, everyone can make
a difference.
At the same time it has to be easy to make the right choice,...
Socialists are pushing for
more action on climate change, since it is necessary to act now,
leaving aside the disastrous “business as usual approach”.
Socialist MEP Linda McAvan (Labour UK) hosted the WWF debate “EU
Climate action : Do 30% NOW!” on 6 May 2008. Here are a few
conclusions from the meeting:
EU has proven to be on the right path in fighting against climate
change but more has to be done. Achieving deep emission reductions
in Europe by 2020 is not only a question of available technologies
but rather one of taking right political decisions. At national
level, governments have to create the right incentives to support
energy efficiency and promote investments in low carbon
technologies and renewables, while at the European level, the
European Emissions Trading Scheme should form the central part of
the overall European strategy.
If Europe is quite confident that they will move all together in
the same direction, what about the others? We have to bear in mind
that even if climate change is a global issue, developed countries
have an historical responsibility towards developing ones.
Therefore OECD countries have to help developing countries to
decouple economic growth from greenhouse emissions and adapt to
climate change...
read more
Published Monday, May 5, 2008 at 12:22
by
asa.westlund
in Save our planet (217 views and 4 comments)
Sometimes I wonder if
we only can discuss one environmental topic at the time.
Right now we discuss Climate Change.
It’s great. Combating Climate Change is a matter of survival. We
can already see the effects. Heat waves in Europe killing thousands
of people. Hurricanes killing thousands people in the US and
leaving thousands more homeless. Droughts in Africa and parts of
Asia with devastating effects on millions of people and whole
regions.
Still, there is more to sustainable development than combating
Climate Change. And sometimes the different topics are linked
together. And very often they have social dimensions.
Let me take three examples.
Air pollution in major cities kills. Particles and gases in the air
get to your lungs and make our lives shorter. Most vulnerable to
bad air quality are young, older and individuals already suffering
from different illnesses. The EU is responsible for making most of
the decisions relating to this cross-border problem. Air pollution
also increase the problems created by global warming.
Chemicals make us and the environment sick. I think
read more
Aujourd’hui tous le monde parle du développement durable pour en
faire l’apologie mais peu de personnes savent ce que c’est.
Mauvaise traduction d’un développement soutenable, puis concept
fourre-tout et maintenant mot détourné. Comme cette croissance doit
répondre à l’ensemble des aspirations humaines ont y rajoute au fur
et a mesure des cibles alors que l’idée première n’est déjà pas
bien assimilée. Ca mise en application concrète est donc difficile.
On ne pourra donc pas s’appuyer sur le développement durable comme
objectif.
En outre gouverner c’est ce fixer des priorités et pour préserver
les générations futures la priorité est évidente : éviter que le
Changement climatique ne soie désastreux. Tout le monde, ou
presque, admet que l'excès de gaz à effet de serre modifie le
climat. Il augmente la température, ce qui, au mieux, amènera un
climat plus dure et moins fertile, au pire, une extinction massif
d'espèces, y compris les humains. Mais même le meilleur des
scénarios, c'est une production agricole en baise et surtout plus
aléatoire, l'épuisement des énergies facilement disponibles, la
perte de terres habitables, des catastrophes naturelles plus
fréquentes … Le tout avec une...
read more
Published Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 09:22
by
eromerof
in Save our planet (175 views and 0 comments)
Willy Brandt: “Democratic socialism has the ability to make
new beginnings possible”.
Democratic socialism has been able to respond to new challenges
and to a new a state of affairs through equality and social
justice. Just as pacifism or feminism were integrated as new
elements in the cluster of socialist values, the time has now
come to include sustainable development as a central element of
our socialist thinking and political practice.
The Left should take into account the consequences of
environmental degradation for our planet and introduce solidarity
as a fundamental principle in the implementation of a model of
sustainable development that is fairer and more responsible. The
challenge for the 21st century no longer is to achieve a better
redistribution of wealth and fight for equal opportunities but
also to respond to the more complex challenge of making the
environment healthier both at local and global level.
Ecosocialism should therefore be understood as a question of
solidarity between and among generations, both in time and space.
A NEW MODEL OF DEVELOPMENT
Europe has paved the way for environmental policies aiming at
‘cleaning up’ the environment. However setting limits to
polluting emissions or working on water and waste management...
Sometimes it takes old
technologies to solve the problems of modern life! This is the case
in the Greater Manchester Region, United Kingdom, where good
old-fashioned rail helped the regions out of its problems with
traffic congestion and pollution.
"50 years ago Greater Manchester abandoned its tram system and
in the 1980s the area faced major congestion problems. With the
introduction of ‘Metrolink’ in 1992 a lot of these problems were
solved," explains Dave Quayle.
40 million car journeys off
‘Metrolink’ is unusual because the vehicles are running on both
‘traditional’, heavy rail lines and tram tracks. This makes public
transport in the...
read more
Henning Meyer, Head of European Programme for
the Global
Policy Institute, kicked off the debate on New Social Europe in London on 11
March 2008 by warning that if certain issues aren’t currently
reflected within the debate, such as economic globalisation, they
become accepted as givens. He then put to the floor what we mean
when we talk about social Europe. There are different applications
of the social model, but there seems to be a consensus on some key
elements:
a responsive political economy
free and compulsory education
active protection of environment
robust welfare state
limitation of inequality
However, the economic layers of governance have been eroded by
globalisation. There is an increased pressure on costs. If we
debate the reform of the European social model, we need to debate
the reform of globalisation. Economic globalisation increases
within and between countries.
How can we develop a politics of international
redistribution?
Henning proposed that we needed a politics of national and
international redistribution - we need to explore a global social
politics. This includes:
reforming how we measure the gross domestic product. We need
to...
Published Wednesday, April 9, 2008 at 10:25
by
martina
in Save our planet (497 views and 2 comments)
Climate neutrality, or, in scientific terms 'CO2 neutrality',
describes processes by which the global CO2 balance remains
constant (source: Wikipedia).
In my opinion this CO2 balance no longer exists – we need to
bring back this balance before we can actually maintain it. In a
time of increased environmental awareness, this worthy goal can
nevertheless produce unusual ideas.
Our lifestyles are often careless: jetting off to remote
countries, taking the car to go to the bakery around the corner,
using the tumble dryer and all the other small things which makes
life easy. These actions need no longer give us a guilty
conscience. By spending a bit of money you can compensate for
your polluting sins. For example, take a look at Atmosfair,
Greenmiles, The Climate Company or My Climate. There are probably
more such projects, especially outside Germany. Yet a study from
Tufts
University in Boston revealed that only three of thirteen
such ‘compensation agencies’, including Atmosfair and My Climate,
are actually recommended service providers.
When travelling by plane, Atmosfair can help you obtain a cleaner conscience.
You can pay when you book, but also calculate and compensate for
your CO2 emissions later. When typing...
Published Tuesday, April 8, 2008 at 15:12
by
Wind Energy
in Save our planet (383 views and 0 comments)
The world is facing
an energy and climate crisis. Globally, the energy sector emits 26
billion tonnes of CO2 each year and electricity production alone
accounts for 41% of emissions. The International Energy Agency
expects CO2 emissions in 2030 to have increased by 55% to reach
more than 40 billion tonnes of CO2. The share of emissions coming
from electricity production will increase to 44% in 2030, reaching
18 billion tonnes of CO2. Europe is going to be importing a growing
share of its energy at unpredictable but most likely higher prices,
from unstable regions, in ever-fiercer competition with the rest of
the world and at staggering environmental cost. Spare electricity
generating capacity is at a historic low. Europe has to invest in
new capacity to replace ageing plants and meet future demand. In
the period 2005-2030, the EU needs to install 862 GW of new
electricity generating capacity. 427 GW of generating capacity will
be retired in the EU and an additional 435 GW will be needed to
satisfy the growing demand for power. The required capacity exceeds
the total capacity operating in Europe (723 GW). Satisfying our
energy needs over the coming decades will be a big challenge. For a
region that currently imports 56% of its energy – and is on track
to reach 70% in the next 20 to 30 years – the challenge is big. Our
own...
read more
Europe is unique in the way it tries to combine a free market
economy with social justice. But things are changing with
globalization and our ageing society. Conservatives say we can no
longer afford high standards of social and environmental
protection. We say our welfare states are our strength, that a
society in which everyone can participate, contribute and benefit
will be a strong and prosperous society. We say our welfare states
must be renewed - not dismantled: reformed to meet new challenges,
not taken apart.
The PES agreed on 10 Principles for a New Social Europe at our Congress
at the end of 2006. But what should be our priorities for 2009-14?
What should be done at the European level in the years ahead?
Labour Movement for Europe launched a debate on the New Social
Europe theme of the PES manifesto consultation with a range of
exciting speakers:
Published Tuesday, March 25, 2008 at 10:16
by
cafeneaua.politica
in Save our planet (386 views and 2 comments)
The most important matter of sustainable development doesn’t
support the quantity of economic growth but the quality of an
environmental, economic, social, and cultural development.A
sustainable community effort consists of a long-term and
integrated systems approach to developing and achieving a healthy
community by balanced environmental, economic, social, and
cultural issues. The Romanian (European) Social Democrats
advocates a sustainable development of our planet and not the
destruction of the environment and our resources.
It is necesary that the price of the different resources must
cover all calculatable external costs. The government has to add
the calculated charges so the different resources get the same
conditions on the market. If the charges are creating an income,
this income is to restitute to the inhabitants and to the
companies (the same restitution per inhabitants or worker).
As basic measures we can talk about sustainable development when
total production of the region is sufficient to provide for the
inhabitant’s needs without requiring more resources than the area
can regenerate (energies,...
A group of German PES activists are the first to send in a paper
with ideas for the PES manifesto. Read the German contribution in the documents section of
Yourspace.
The EU working group from the SPD in Berlin proposes eight 'building
blocks' for the PES manifesto:
Published Wednesday, March 19, 2008 at 16:50
by
Poul_Nyrup_Rasmussen
in Save our planet (375 views and 5 comments)
The suggestion to
focus more on environmental issues is certainly a good one. I
usually refer to it as a new strategy for ‘smart green growth’, but
‘New Sustainable Europe’ and ‘New Social Europe is also Green’ are
also catchy headlines. Thanks to our PES activist for his
ideas!
Smart green growth is already mentioned in the PES strategy for a
New Social Europe: we suggest ambitious
investments in research and in new energy forms. It’s about
millions of new jobs. The conservatives look at the costs here and
now, we look at the new opportunities for all: potentially millions
of new and better jobs. Europe’s socialists and social democrats
need to be proactive and consider how becoming greener can lead to
growth and new jobs – such a strategy is certainly something which
should be a central part of our manifesto for the 2009
elections.
Post cards from the PES President
This week Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, president of the Party of European
Socialists, comments on some of the most popular posts on
Yourspace. This is the third of six post cards from the PES
President.read more
How do you encourage people to more sustainable life styles? By
setting a good example! Bernd Vögerle, Mayor of Gerasdorf in
Austria, explains about his city's efforts to become greener.
Green cities
On 15 May 2008 the PES Group in the Committee of the Regions will
host a conference on ‘Save our Planet’ in Torino, Italy. Leading up
to the event Yourspace invites local and regional politicians to
give their view on what the PES manifesto should say about the
environment. This article is the third in the ‘Green cities’
series, offering a local perspective on global challenges.read more
Even though discussion
paper 'Save our
planet' concentrates mostly on energy policy, I would like
discuss also about the influence of the traffic emissions.
Traffic is excluded from Kyoto protocol, but it still produces 20
percent of all CO2 emissions. The European Parliament tried to
restrict emissions of private cars, but right wing coalition
watered down that decision. What we need to reduce emissions of the
traffic is better public transportation and restricting heavily
polluting cars.
It’s quite controversial that when we have just started to realise
the power of the climate change, we have also started to fly more
than ever. Flying is definitely the most polluting way of traffic
and yet it’s still cheaper than ever before. Our goal should be
that using train is always cheaper than flying or using private
cars, but at the moment we are far, far away from that goal. In
Central Europe flying from one big city to another might be cheaper
than taking a taxi from airport to the centre. I’m afraid that
consumers are not willing to change this. It’s too attempting to
fly away for a weekend with less than 50 euros - for the first time
in history is travelling possible for everyone. I have to admit
that I haven’t been thinking...
read more
Prioritisation of human rights and democracy in the world.
This area of prioritisation must affect political support and
trade conditions in countries and areas globally. Workers rights
and women’s rights must be included as well. EU must show
clearly, that there is a difference in the treatment of countries
and areas, where democracy and human rights are respected.
Economic, climate and social sustainability We need to give
technological support, build states, and give right to energy to
the citizens. All people should further have a right to
education. All of this is to be implemented with a view to
sustainability.
Human ressources Knowledge sharing, education, and
sensitivity to brain drain must be thought into EU global policy.
Published Friday, March 14, 2008 at 11:48
by
AnneSofie
in Save our planet (393 views and 1 comments)
Scandinavian
PES
activistsmet in the village of Jørlunde, located on the
island of Zealand, Denmark on March 1st and 2nd 2008 to discuss
European democracy, politics and the PES manifesto.
Over sometimes heated discussions, the 80 participants agreed on
a number is issues, which we feel must be included in the PES
manifesto. Here is our suggestions for the theme 'Save our
planet':
Within the international community, the EU must be the leader
in the struggle for advances within energy and climate change.
All member states must implement radical changes in their energy
and climate policies. Therefore it is necessary to remove the
trade in CO2 quotas, because it constitutes a real stumbling
block for action and for the realisation of change, which will
have an effect.
It is not enough with state intervention and cooperation. The
global warming and the threat from the changes to our climate
must be fought at all levels of society. The citizens must get
actively involved. It demands a change of attitude for each
citizen. The social democrats in Denmarkcan for instance
elaborate a set of tools, which makes the...
Published Monday, March 10, 2008 at 10:12
by
frederic.vareillas
in Save our planet (388 views and 3 comments)
Bonjour à celles et ceux qui voudront bien prendre le temps de me
lire, (Bonne journée de la Femme).
- J' ai déjà écrit au sujet de "Gaïa" et de Lovelock et je n'y
reviendrai pas ici.
- EN REVANCHE, je vous conseille à toutes et tous de lire le numéro
de cette semaine de : "Le Nouvel Observateur" (6-12 mars 2008):
Page 90-91 : "2029 : Le Krach écologique", par Geneviève FERONE,
sur les effets désastreux du changement climatique et de la crise
énergétique en Europe et dans le monde. Nous devons agir dès 2009,
nous socialistes Européens.
Page 5-6 : "Nicholas Stern ; le sonneur de tocsin", par
Jean-Gabriel FREDET : Exhortons l'Europe et le Monde à changer de
modèle de croissance très très vite.
Pour les plus courageux, signalons toujours, en Poche (pas cher) :
"Un monde de ressources Rares", par Eric ORSENNA et Le Cercle des
Economistes (2007) :
Changeons notre économie, fondée sur la finance et les monnaies,
pour une économie fondée sur les flux énergétiques et leur coût
réel.
Faisons donc changer l'Europe le plus vite possible vers une
civilisation du recyclage, de la décroissance, de l'électricité, de
l'électronique, des transports en commun, de la...
read more
Published Saturday, March 1, 2008 at 18:32
by
rikkeindenmark
in New Social Europe (421 views and 0 comments)
The afternoon of the Danish conference on the PES manifesto ended with a
plenary where the four work groups presented a ‘top 3’ of
priorities for their manifesto theme. Here are, from my view,
some of the most interesting ideas brought forward:
The PES manifesto should propose to put an end to the
emissions trading scheme where rich countries can buy CO2 credits
from the developing world
Fighting climate change needs to take place on many levels:
the international, the national and the individual. EU should
offer the citizens a ‘package’ of suggestions to how they can
reduce their energy consumption
Public transport should be free in Europe
The PES manifesto should encourage that the Scandinavian
welfare model is spread to other European countries (non-Nordic
people, what do you think? Do you agree?)
It should also underline that the social rights of people
working outside their home country are important to protect
Europe’s social democrats should consider what a European,
social democratic identity looks like. What do we have in common
– and how can we use that in our political work and the campaign
for the 2009 elections?
The EU should promote democracy and human rights in its
external policies: for example, in trade policy favour countries
with decent working conditions and respect for human...
We have two years left before oil and gas cost ten times more
than today; solar energy and wind turbines can supply maximum 7
percent of our total consumption of energy; oceans are littered
with plastic bags, wrappings, and are 80 percent DEAD; the sun is
getting hotter; we are killing the great forests to get wood to
burn (and transform into paper); Earth's temperature is rising 2
degrees Celsius (which is huge) due to CO2 and methane.
What would you say if we could recycle and reutilize nuke waste
and nuke plants?
Think again: We have two years in front of us before the great
depression.
Published Thursday, February 28, 2008 at 17:20
by
Gwendoline
in Save our planet (371 views and 4 comments)
The Svalbard Global Seed Vault has been
officially inaugurated on 26 February. A big vault has been
hollowed in the Spitzberg (Norway): 4,000,000 seeds are now
stored by -18°C! Researchers of all over the world have been
working hard on this huge project. The aim is to “provide and
ultimate safety net to conserve a capacity to feed the planet in
the event of a disaster”. This safe deposit system has a
refrigerating device to lower the temperature of the mountain
that sometimes reaches -3ºC (in case the global warming were to
reach peaks). The plant databank is made of edible seeds that
would enable humanity to survive and recover from a global
catastrophy.
See a video on the project:
This type of projects makes one believes in humankind. Of course
the very reason why we are building such a place is rather sad!
Are we going to witness a Noah's ark for animals? For human
beings? At the end of the day, every so-called superior species
has vanished from the surface of the Earth. So should we really
try to save...
We have seen a very lively debate about a number of relevant topics
in the 'Save
our planet' section of Yourspace. The contributions from
bloggers and PES activists demonstrate a growing interest in
climate change issues, and they offered important ideas for the PES
to work on. Here are the highlights:
Biofuels
The pro’s and con’s of EU support for biofuels have been a hot topic with a
big number of comments from our participants. Migeru, taipale and
other users were sceptical whether the current generation of
biofuels are really an answer to energy scarcity. Clearly,
participants want a sustainable answer and not one, which threatens
to add to environmental problems.
Encouraging greener life styles
What is your individual answer to climate change? The idea to
calculate our individual contribution to climate change, the
so-called carbon footprint, has been received with interest. Nanne
from Berlin added an important point: this user called for
political support and advice for a green life style. One option is
the the so-called 'front-runner approach', an idea the PES can and
should discuss...
read more
Published Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 10:16
by
frederic.vareillas
in Save our planet (442 views and 2 comments)
Dear friends,
I would like to share two other readings with you so as we're
able to think Europe's near future through:
First: There's a very interesting issue of "L'Ecologiste" #24;
Oct-Dec 2007 (French version of the original "The Ecologist",
London, UK) about the biofuel hoax and slowing our cars' speed.
Also look at the present issue of "The Ecologist": "The end
of food as we know it" (London, 2008). You should also have
a look at the website: www.theecologist.org – it’s interesting
(English and French versions available).
Second: A French essay by Eric Orsenna and Le Cercle des
Economistes: "Un monde de ressources rares" (2008,
paperback, French only). They offer some economical and political
ways to deal with scarcity.
True. Nuclear power is not 100 percent safe but which energy is?
Coalmines ? Gas? Forget it: To many deaths. And oil is the
poison, our lethal addiction. I remember Chernobyl but, compared
to a French reactor, Chernobyl 3 was a poor piece of junk. Risk
zero doesn't exist.
Do we really have a choice? For the generation to come (25
years), nuclear power is the only possible choice unless we want
to be in a new dark age (back to middle ages). Do you want this
regression? Again, do we have a choice? We should have changed
and adapted 25 years ago when the oil prices quadrupled. We
didn't. Europe needs power - Europe needs electricity to avoid
wars and to keep civilized.
As to the disposal of nuclear WASTE I recommend again you read
Sir Jim Lovelock's book "Revenge of Gaia". This book is
a project to save civilization from the dark age. While you're at
it, you should also read "Vers un monde de ressources
rares" by Eric Orsenna and Le Cercle des Economistes" (2007,
paperback).
Then you'll understand the urgency of the present Europe's (and
Earth's) situation. Good luck, keep it up!
Published Monday, February 25, 2008 at 09:20
by
frederic.vareillas
in Save our planet (431 views and 6 comments)
Hi,
I strongly advise all PES activists to read sir James Lovelock's "The
revenge of Gaia" (2008, paperback). We absolutely need to
take his views into account.
Lovelock is 89 years old: He has nothing to lose and he tells us
everything we need to know.
Please read his book and think twice before you get your act
together.
Published Friday, February 15, 2008 at 10:50
by
carl0s
in Save our planet (501 views and 3 comments)
Many of our European
cities are blessed with a ring of surrounding countryside, such as
forests and other protected places. These act as a city's lungs and
provide an escape from the urban pace of life. In health terms, I
have never seen an adequate cost-benefit analysis of what this
means for the public.
Unfortunately, these are often so pleasant, in contrast to a
polluted and crowded city, that many people want to live there, and
then more still, until the urban sprawl swallows up the landscape
in a mish-mash of upmarket housing.
In order to justify the continued existence of these "green belt"
areas, we need to develop a convincing economic case - so we can
say that unspoilt land saves us money in future hospital treatment,
doctor's time, and environmental spin-offs. And we make it clear
that future generations will rely on such spaces being
available.
I would argue that there is a slightly paradoxical approach that
should be adopted here. Where the city itself is well-maintained,
with adequate infrastructure, housing, parks and leisure, and there
is a sense of civic pride, I would argue that this relieves the
pressure on the green areas in the outer suburbs.
The problems with preserving the Green Belt around London, one of
Labour's post-war achievements, reflect a...
read more
Published Wednesday, February 13, 2008 at 15:55
by
Eric
in Save our planet (621 views and 3 comments)
Hey!
It’s my third day as your guest blogger, and today I would like
to present some specific policy proposals. And I will start with
a political issue very close to my heart: the environment.
None of my parents (Bo and
Gunnel) were members of a political party when I
grew up. However, my dad Bo was very interested in politics in
general, and environmental issues in particular. He started
working with green issues already in the early 1960s, when
Rachel Carson’s book ”Silent Spring” served as one
of the first alarm bells. At the time, my dad did some research
into why some birds’ eggs were too shallow and broke before the
new little bird was born. The reason was that the birds were fed
with foodstuffs containing mercury.
Ever since 1960s, we have gradually become better at ensuring
that growth must be ecologically and socially sustainable. If
growth means that birds are fed mercury, our society will not be
sustainable in the long run. The EU has been good at slowly
transforming societies in the right direction in this way, and
Mark Leonard wrote a fantastic little book about
how the EU's ”soft power” is so much more efficient than the...
When speaking to Ilmar
Reepalu, Mayor of Malmö, Sweden, and member of the PES Group in the Committee of the Regions, you realize
that mentality is really the key to change when it comes to
combating climate change. Since the mid-nineties Reepalu has been
working to change Malmö from an industrial town to a modern, green
capital of the region. And with great success – Malmö has received
numerous prizes for its green projects, most recently the
prestigious ‘LivCom’ award in London.
“The beginning of the nineties was a time of crisis for traditional
industry in Malmö and 26,000 people lost their jobs. We needed to
change the priorities of the town from industrial production to
knowledge economy and as a part of this process we wanted to go
green,” explains Reepalu.
Completely sustainable housing
For more than 15 years the city council has been working to inspire
a more eco-friendly mentality among the citizens of Malmö. The
approach is whole-hearted and grasps everything from encouraging
school children to plant trees to introducing better public
transportation. The flag-ship project...
read more
This week Barroso
presented one of his most ambitious proposals to date; a climate and energy package that outlines how Europe
can lead in climate protection. But is it really ambitious enough?
Here are a few of the package’s key ingredients:
A ‘low-carbon Europe’ by 2020: 20% reduction in greenhouse
gases; 20% more effective use of energy, and 20% of energy from
wind, solar and other renewable sources.
The richer the country, the more ambitious the target.
Germany will, for example, have to get 18 percent of its energy
from renewables by 2020. In comparison poorer country like Malta
will only have to achieve 10 %
Today emission certificates are basically handed out for
free. From 2013 the EU ‘Emission Trading Scheme’ will gradually
move to the complete auctioning of emission certificates for some
10,000 energy-intensive plants across Europe - representing
around 40% of the EU's total CO2 emissions.
No ‘eco dumping’: when importing goods from polluting
countries European companies will have to pay extra taxes, if a
global agreement on reduction cannot be found.
Reactions are mixed. Ministers and energy companies are
complaining that they find the targets way too...
Breaking Europe’s
dependence on oil should be the focus of an ‘Oil Forum’ bringing
together politicians, industry, scientists and EU institutions say
PES President Poul Nyrup Rasmussen and Swedish Social Democratic
Party Leader Mona Sahlin.
The Forum would draw up a programme to reduce Europe’s dependence
on oil – identifying where EU-regulations come into conflict with
efforts to end the dependence on oil, and propose new policies at
the EU level.
“Oil, together with other fossil fuels, contributes up to 90
per cent of greenhouse gas emissions” said Mona Sahlin.
“To tackle climate change we must break our dependence on
oil.”
“The rising cost of oil poses a major threat to our
economies” said Poul Nyrup Rasmussen “and has the
potential to cause instability and conflict.”
Read the full press release and the letter from Rasmussen and Sahlin to Commission
President Barroso.
What do you think about the idea of a European ‘Oil Forum’?
read more
Published Thursday, December 13, 2007 at 10:00
by
taipale
in Save our planet (609 views and 5 comments)
Best regards from
Bali. I was there last week to organize and speak in
two side events on behalf of the Ministry of the Environment of
Finland. The topic in both of the events was to highlight the
energy and emission savings potential of buildings and
construction. Big.
Now, it is time to focus on Copenhagen, where the new climate
protocol should be finalized and agreed upon in 2009. This is a
huge challenge not only for the City of Copenhagen and Denmark
hosting the meeting, but to Sweden’s EU Presidency and to the
European Union as a whole.
The EU needs it own “roadmap” towards Copenhagen, making sure that
the EU not only upholds but strengthens its position as the world
leader in progressive and innovative climate policies. This means
including all aspects of sustainable use of energy, such as energy
for development, fair mechanisms of technology transfer, and decent
work. This also requires that the European Union is unanimous and
strong in its positions.
The EU should use its best diplomacy, most determined political
cooperation, and financial bilateral mechanisms to make certain
that developing countries, China and India in specific, will play a
fair but focal role in Copenhagen. That the same goes for the
United...
read more